Denim from Recycled Ocean Plastic


G-Star recently launched their new denim line that’s made from recycled plastic from our oceans. It’s also getting star power from Pharrell Williams.

The process is pretty neat. First, plastic pollution is retrieved from the ocean. Second, the plastic is broken down and shredded into fibers that are then spun into Bionic yarn. Third, the yarn is woven or knitted into clothing.


It’s great to see a brand proactively help solve one of our most pressing environmental issues - ocean pollution.

Levi’s did something similar a couple years ago. Even though they only replaced 20% of the cotton per pair of jeans, they pioneered the idea of using plastic fibers.

Most jeans are made out of cotton, which is a highly volatile commodity because it requires a significant amount of water to grow. On average, it takes about 25-30 gallons of water to grow a single cotton plant. Not to mention, manufacturing the jeans themselves takes a lot of water. And those distressed jeans that were all the rage? Those taken even more water to manufacture (or “distress”). We often fail to realize the amount of natural resources it takes to make many of products we take for granted today.

Check out G-Star’s site to learn more about their cause.

When I Found Out Paper Accounts for Most of Our Solid Waste


If someone asked me what I thought contributed to most of our solid waste, I would have said plastics. Surprisingly, paper accounts for most of our solid waste. 

According to the EPA, here’s a breakdown of our solid waste before recycling (2012 stats):


How Can We Make Recycling Convenient?

In his 2012 Huffington Post article, Mattias Wallander, the CEO of a textile recycling company, provided eye-opening statistics on why Americans don’t recycle:

  • 64% of survey respondents said they wouldn’t go more than 5 miles to recycle clothes and shoes
  • 84% said convenience was an important factor in deciding where to drop off clothes
  • 91% said they’d support the installation of more textile recycling drop-boxes in their neighborhoods
  • 80% said they weren’t aware of the amount of textiles being discarded annually

At first, I thought people were just plain lazy for not recycling. But the more I thought about it, the more I realized that it’s a bigger, societal issue. Recycling and our consumerist impact on the environment aren’t top-of-mind for most people because they’re out-of-sight. Meaning, when we throw things in the trash, they’re taken away and we never see them again. We feel we don’t have to worry about what happens to our garbage. We are so far removed from landfills and toxic waste zones, even though they are harming surrounding ecosystems and people. 

Here’s what’s mind-boggling - the EPA estimates that 75 percent of solid waste is recyclable, but only about 30 percent is actually recycled. Wow.

There’s a lot to be done to make recycling more convenient. Individuals, non-profits, city governments, schools, and corporations can all help make recycling top-of-mind. Convenience stores like Walgreens and CVS can set up recycling programs - similar to Target and Whole Foods. What better way to put the convenience in recycling than with the help of convenience stores?

Reduce, Reuse, Recycle with the Help of Thrift Shops


When People Talk about Taking Cruises

"A seven-day cruise produces about 18 days’ worth of carbon dioxide." - Slate magazine

When My Neighbor Is Debating Whether to Buy a Gas-Guzzling SUV

The Amount of Styrofoam Cups Thrown Away Each Year in the US


"Each year Americans throw away 25,000,000,000 Styrofoam cups. Even 500 years from now, the foam coffee cup you used this morning will be sitting in a landfill." - US EPA


I often get the urge to sort or pick up garbage. I know this makes me sound like a homeless person, but it’s true. I see people throwing recyclables into the garbage can or on the ground every day and everywhere I go. Whenever I see plastic bottles or cardboard boxes in the garbage or on the sidewalk, I feel the need to pick them up and put them in the recycling bin. My boyfriend plays the role of Indiana Jones’ father, holding me back and gently telling me to let the plastic cups go.

There are a few problems with my picking up after everyone:

  • It’s not efficient. I could and would be happy to spend my work day making sure all of our recyclables actually make it to the recycling centers but unfortunately, I can’t do it alone. We all need to pitch in and hold each other accountable for our waste. 

  • I’m not the only one who has a problem with recyclables in the garbage can or on the street. If we don’t put recyclables in the recycling bins at my office, the cleaning lady has to sort out recyclables from our trash cans. We can make her job a lot easier by simply putting our recyclables in the blue recycling bin that’s literally right next to our garbage can. All it takes is a flick of the wrist.

  • I think the bigger issue here is not making recycling a priority. It’s hard to find recycling bins when you’re out and about in the city and we’re not putting enough pressure on people who litter.

C’mon guys. Let’s make this world a little cleaner for the next generation.


About a year ago, I was at the SoWa Open Market in Boston with a friend when I stumbled upon a booth selling t-shirts with cute phrases like “You Otter Recycle”. The woman at the booth told me that proceeds from the t-shirts go towards providing environmental education to students. The organization she works for, Change is Simple, brings environmental education to schools and businesses.

An excerpt from the Change is Simple website: “Teaching open-minded elementary students that small changes in their habits can make huge improvements to the environment is extremely powerful. Change is Simple was founded on the values that Lauren and Patrick live by: use resources in a way that does not undermine future generations from using those same resources; live simply; be active in your community; let your passion drive you; and empower others.”

What a wonderful mission. It warms my heart to learn that organizations like Change is Simple are out there. 

(Image source: Change is Simple)


"E-Hell on Earth: Where the West’s Electronics Go to Die" is the title of an article I recently read on Gizmodo. It features Agbogbloshie, the largest e-waste processing site in Ghana, where our old laptops, tablets, and iPhones are dumped in a massive landfill.

“[Agbogbloshie] is a major destination for the developed world’s electronic waste, processing millions of tons of unwanted electronics every year. Most of this “processing” work is performed by young men and children who burn electronics to extract the valuable copper that they contain for pennies on the dollar. A ‘good haul’ reportedly earns workers less than $4 a day, while releasing hordes of toxic chemicals into the environment. This deadly chemical cocktail poisons the surrounding land, air, water, and workers - stunting their mental and physical development.”

The article and its haunting photos stuck with me, and I couldn’t stop thinking about possible solutions:


I talk about education quite a bit on my blog, but it’s because I honestly believe educating the public is the first step in bringing about a sense of responsibility and mindfulness. Educating the public on e-waste can happen in many ways. We can reach out to local politicians and ask that they make it easier for people to responsibly dispose of their electronics. We can ask corporations to play a larger role in promoting ways to recycle devices. We can work within our communities to set up e-waste recycle bins and ensure that electronics are properly recycled. We can start petitions asking the EPA to report reliable data on how much e-waste is exported. We can do all these things publicly and with the help of social media, we can spread the word rapidly as letters to corporations or online petitions go viral.

And because we live in an age of irony, we use our electronics to educate people on reducing the number of electronics they buy and responsibly recycling the electronics they do.


There’s also an opportunity for tech companies to better promote e-cycling on their packaging. A quick step-by-step guide on where and how to recycle electronic devices won’t take up too much space on the package, and it’ll show consumers that companies care about where their devices go after leaving the store. Seeing the recycling information on the package can prompt sales associates to educate shoppers on where they can take their old devices when they’re ready to purchase a new one. We know the number of devices per person will continue to grow. The best thing we can do right now is educate each person on recycling their devices responsibly.

More information

Here’s an infographic from 2012 that lays out e-waste by the numbers.

The EPA’s page on e-waste.

(Image source: Michael Ciaglo)

When Some of the Smartest People I Know Fail to Recycle



A Series of WTFs


WTF are fossil fuels?

Definition: forms of stored solar energy created from incomplete biological decomposition of dead organic matter. Include coal, crude oil, and natural gas.

Do fossil fuels come from dinosaurs?

I suppose that would make sense since we generally associate the term “fossil” with dinosaurs. However, what I’m hearing is that fossil fuels don’t actually come from the remains of dead dinosaurs. That would be too cool. The US Department of Energy states that “most of the fossil fuels we find today were formed millions of years before the first dinosaurs. Fossil fuels, however, were once alive! They were formed from prehistoric plants and animals that lived hundreds of millions of years ago.” Science writer, Bob Strauss, says that “according to the best theories currently available - microscopic bacteria, and not house-sized dinosaurs, produced today’s oil reserves.” 

WTF are greenhouse gases?

Definition: the suite of gases that produce a greenhouse effect, such as carbon dioxide, methane, and water vapor. (A greenhouse effect occurs when water vapor and several other gases warm the Earth’s atmosphere by trapping some of the heat radiating from the Earth’s atmospheric system.)

Where does the term “greenhouse” come from?

The Earth’s atmosphere is made up of several layers of gases. When the sun warms the Earth during the day, its heat travels through the atmosphere and reaches Earth’s surface. The heat from the Earth travels back into the atmosphere. The layers of gases in the atmosphere trap some of the heat, working like a greenhouse. The windows of a greenhouse retain heat, keeping the greenhouse warm at night and through the winter. Similarly, greenhouse gases keep the Earth from freezing.

What’s the issue with greenhouse gases?

The fossil fuels we burn contribute to higher concentrations of greenhouse gases, making the layers in the atmosphere thicker and trapping more heat. The stronger the greenhouse effect, the warmer the global temperatures.

What does this have to do with polar bears?

Polar bears have evolved for a life on the sea ice, which they rely on for reaching their seal prey. But the arctic sea ice is rapidly diminishing due to a warming Earth, affecting the entire arctic ecosystem, from copepods to seals to walruses. For polar bears, sea ice losses mean:

  • Reduced access to food

  • Drop in body condition

  • Lower cub survival rates

  • Increase in drowning

  • Increase in cannibalism

  • Loss of access to denning areas

  • Declining population size

(Source: Polar Bears International)

There’s a lot of information out there about greenhouse gases. To understand the most basic terms, this link might help, as might this one.

WTF is global warming?

Definition: natural or human-induced increase in the average global temperature of the atmosphere near Earth’s surface.

How can global warming be real if we’re experiencing some of the coldest winters on record?

At the beginning of 2014, Chicago had one of its coldest winters on record, leading people to question whether global warming was actually occurring. But while the reality for Chicagoans at the time was extreme freezing temperatures, potholes riddling the streets, and ice everywhere they turned, the reality for Australians on the other side of the globe was extreme heat, destructive wildfires, and drought. Extreme weather - whether (no pun intended) hot or cold - doesn’t tell us what’s going to happen with climate in the long-term. The NOAA defines “weather” as conditions at a given point in time (e.g., today’s high temperature), whereas “climate” refers to the average weather conditions for an area over a long period of time (e.g., the average high temperature for today’s date). We can’t dispel the concept of global warming because of the short-term weather we experience. We need to look at the long-term climate trends instead.

A recent Scientific American article and a recent US News article provide more information.

Neil deGrasse Tyson also does a great job helping us visualize the difference between weather and climate.

WTF is climate change?

Definition: change in mean annual temperature and other aspects of climate over periods of time ranging from decades to hundreds of years to several million years.

What’s the issue with climate change?

Yes, climate change is natural. But, the speed at which climate change is happening is not. Since the Industrial Revolution began in the 18th century, humans have made an increasing impact on climate change. The human activities making the biggest impact on climate change include the production and waste of plastic, major deforestation, and adding billions of tons of heat-trapping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. In the fall of 2013, Stanford scientists reported that climate change is on pace to occur 10 times faster than any change recorded in past 65 million years. Climate change has detrimental effects on human health, natural ecosystems, civil infrastructures, and the economy.

More information

Learn more about the impacts of climate change in a recent report.

The EPA and climate change.

Read about plastic bags and climate change.

For more climate change myths, check out this link.

(Image source: Pinterest)

Jetsetting and Carbon Offsetting


The basic idea behind carbon offsetting is compensating for the carbon you create. Sure, we reduce, reuse, and recycle, but most of our lifestyles still produce waste and carbon dioxide (i.e. driving, flying, using styrofoam and other non-recyclables, etc.). It’s almost impossible to have a carbon footprint of zero but buying carbon offsets can get us pretty close if they’re calculated and purchased correctly.

To me, air travel has one of the biggest opportunities in carbon offsetting. In 2013 alone, Americans took 1.6 billion leisure trips and 452 million business trips. That’s a lot of trips. That’s also a crazy amount of carbon emissions.

I haven’t double checked these numbers but about a year and a half ago, The New York Times reported that “one round-trip flight from New York to Europe or to San Francisco creates a warming effect equivalent to 2 or 3 tons of carbon dioxide per person [and that] the average American generates about 19 tons of carbon dioxide a year; the average European, 10.”

I’ve seen some airlines - like Air Canada, United, and Virgin - make it easier for flyers to offset their carbon emissions by providing links to carbon offsetting programs. But, these links or call-to-action buttons are usually small and unnoticeable, which is sad because I think it would benefit airlines to make their environmental commitment stand out more. Without compromising safety, I think there’s an opportunity here for an airline to emerge as “the most environmentally friendly” airline and show flyers that they know flying produces carbon emissions but that they’re doing everything they can to offset them. To me, that commitment to sustainability would speak volumes for an airline (especially since they don’t often have the best customer service reputation).

When it comes to carbon offsetting programs, there are a number of different types - from forest restoration to tire recycling. Forest restoration might be the most popular one, especially since 81% of Americans believe planting trees will reduce global warming.

Trees can help offset the carbon emissions from air travel since they store (sequester) carbon.

Forests are known as carbon sinks, which essentially means they can absorb large amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Part of the forest’s life cycle is storing carbon dioxide, so when you cut down a single tree (let alone an entire forest), you release carbon dioxide into the air - the carbon dioxide that was trapped in the tree. Not only are you releasing carbon dioxide every time you cut down a tree, you stop any capacity to capture carbon dioxide.

Of course, there will always be critics. Some say carbon offsets don’t actually solve our carbon emission issues and instead give people an easy way out for living wasteful lifestyles. The same is said of businesses who might use carbon offsets to justify wasteful practices. Others believe carbon offsets aren’t enough to compensate for the damage done to the environment. In my opinion, there are certainly truths in the criticism. I appreciate carbon offsetting programs as an option for people trying to reduce their impact. I wish more people and businesses took part in these programs. In fact, I wish it were a mandate for people to purchase carbon offsets not only when they flew but whenever they drove or purchased non-recyclables. Then, we might really see how carbon offsets can make a difference. Just a thought.

More information

An infographic on carbon offsetting.

Neat infographic on the greenest ways to get around.

An example of a carbon footprint calculator. There are many calculators out there. Here’s another one.

You can even figure out how to offset your wedding or parties.

Air Canada’s carbon offsetting page.

The Answer is Education


Some shocking statistics about environmental education in the US:

  • In 1993, only 24% of high schools taught environmental science.

  • In 2000, the number had slowly climbed to 39%. To this day, a majority of high school students don’t even have the option of learning about environmental science.

  • (Only) 50% of Americans believe global warming is caused by human-related activities.

  • 57% of Americans understand the greenhouse effect refers to gases in the atmosphere that trap heat.

  • 60% of Americans can correctly identify natural gas as a fossil fuel.

  • (Surprisingly) 81% of Americans believe planting trees will reduce global warming if done worldwide, and 73% of Americans believe reducing tropical deforestation will reduce global warming if done worldwide.

 I think it’s safe to say not nearly enough Americans understand the fundamentals of environmental science (and perhaps even the concept of sustainability). How do we bridge this gap?

To me, environmental education begins at the elementary level. By making environmental science a required subject for students from elementary school to college, many of the environmental issues we’re facing today might have been prevented.

At the university-level, it’s important for professors to ask that students consider the environment. When we have business students and engineering students thinking about inventing “the next best thing”, they should ask themselves how it impacts the environment and whether it’s sustainable. It doesn’t make sense for business and engineering students to develop something that damages what environmental students are trying to improve. We all need to work together towards a common goal. We only have one earth to cohabit.

By fundamentally instilling an environmental consciousness in students, we’ll begin to see new job opportunities arise in the sustainability field. In my ideal world, people will begin to understand the importance of buying locally, reducing energy usage, and biking instead of driving. I want to bring the public back to the basic principles of reducing, reusing, and recycling.

(Image source: The Saturday Evening Post)

Popular Mechanics and the Concept of Resourcefulness


It was a hot summer day in NYC, but I hardly noticed. I was sitting in the middle of the Popular Mechanics office, shivering from the AC. A dozen tabs open on my desktop computer. Post-it notes scattered all around me. I was an intern at the time and had been assigned to help fact-check an article for the upcoming October issue. The article was about people who live completely off the grid.

Wait a second. There are people in the U.S. who live completely off the grid? Grow their own food, generate their own electricity, and collect all the water they need? I couldn’t believe it. I was amazed by their creativity and resourcefulness. By “resourcefulness”, I mean this mindset of first using what you have and only what you need. I was familiar with this concept of resourcefulness having grown up with a family that reduces and reuses as much as possible. To this day, my grandpa gardens with used materials - plastic milk jugs as plant pots, flattened soy sauce containers as the lining of his cistern, a wheelbarrow made from scraps around the garage. By the way, he’s 93.

While living completely off the grid is extreme, I wish resourcefulness was more top of mind for people. At work, I often think about “resourcefulness” in terms of my team and the hours they spend working on projects. How do I use their time wisely and their skills most effectively? Are we agile enough to adapt to different situations and challenges? We need to ask ourselves similar questions outside of work. Do I need a new car or handbag? Am I too reliant on materials that don’t really matter? How can I be more efficient?

(Image source: Popular Mechanics)